tomok

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:26,097 Points:1,985,410 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 9, 2012 2:12:12 AM
"Although American refineries would use nearly all of the oil transported by the Keystone XL pipeline to manufacture fuels and other products for American consumers and businesses, it would also allow them to continue to export a portion of their products.” Most of the fuel will be exported to the world market and very little used in country, the Keystone XL oil pipeline will not lower fuel prices in the US. Barry could care less about the AFPM. The US oil and natural gas resources that belong to the citizens of this country and are to be used by those same citizens! Barry will support natural gas and oil production to pay for his ‘spending gone wild’ addiction. The price of fuel at the pump is too high! 12/22/2012!
|
Ahking

Champion Author
Orange County
Posts:2,016 Points:330,985 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 11:24:33 PM
no keystone
|
my2002m

Champion Author
Tulsa
Posts:4,264 Points:1,311,070 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:32:59 PM
Build it already otherwise the Chinese are going to buy all the oil.
|
PerSonneL

Champion Author
Alberta
Posts:1,188 Points:736,815 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 5:08:44 PM
another useless one
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:12,522 Points:1,741,020 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 4:42:51 PM
As much as I hate to say this, I hope that when this pipeline is approved, all you idiots that thought it was a good idea - until it drove gas prices above $4 per gallon - are still here to HARRASS.
|
Alfied

Champion Author
Riverside
Posts:6,139 Points:1,402,910 Joined:Jun 2001
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 4:40:09 PM
Somebody has to do it.
|
ModelWarships

Champion Author
Missouri
Posts:4,603 Points:993,410 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 4:32:06 PM
0bummer
|
shores4now

All-Star Author
Kentucky
Posts:558 Points:164,675 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 2:59:34 PM
ok
|
OmieCA

Sophomore Author
California
Posts:247 Points:85,840 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 2:01:40 PM
OK, so we'll assume that the math is correct, Martinman, your point is what?
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:12,522 Points:1,741,020 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 1:45:48 PM
Okay, this is for texas, in barrels per day (bpd).
Refineries with direct port facilities:
Corpus Christi (412,000 bpd)
163,300 - Citgo (Venezuelian owned) 106,700 - Flint Hills (U.S. owned) 142,000 - Valero (U.S. owned)
Texas City (689,000 bdp)
475,000 - British Petroleum (British owned) 214,000 - Valero (U.S. owned)
Port Arthur (745,500 bpd)
285,000 - Motiva (Dutch/Saudi owned) 173,500 - Total (French owned) 287,000 - Valero (U.S. owned)
These Texas refineries total 1,846,500 bpd
Additional Texas refineries with close access to port facilities:
Baytown (Houston) (887,640)
560,640 - ExxonMobil (U.S. owned) 327,000 - Shell (Dutch owned)
Beaumount (Port Arthur) (344,500)
344,500 - ExxonMobil (U.S. owned)
These Texas refineries total (1,232,140 bpd)
So, until we start adding refineries from further inland in Texas, or refineries facilities in Louisiana, the total is only 3,078,640 bpd - or essentially all of the daily exports as reported in the EIA data.
It is likely that other refineries along the Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama Gulf coast are contributing, as well as others further inland in Texas.
Citgo has a 429,500 bpd refinery in Lake Charles Louisiana, and ConocoPhillips has a 247,000 bpd refinery along the Mississippi River, south of New Orleans.
Given that the current total U.S. refining capacity is ~17.2 mbpd, exporting 2.981 mbpd represents 17.4% of total U.S. refining capacity.
[Edited by: Martinman at 2/8/2012 2:51:21 PM EST]
|
JXQW

Champion Author
Kansas City
Posts:2,388 Points:566,745 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 1:14:49 PM
ok
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:12,522 Points:1,741,020 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 1:09:47 PM
snappytom2 from corpus christi posted...
"What is the portion to be exported, 10%, 40%, or 90%? And, how will using Keystone pipeline oil in lieu of other oil supplies create permanent jobs?"
.
My guess is that it is a significant number.
Most of the refineries along the Texas Gulf coast, are in the 200,000 bpd class. Given that they're exporting nearly 3 million barrels per day (2.981 as of the last EIA data), that's the equivalent output of 15 200,000bpd refineries.
I'll look up some information, and provide a better reference.
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:12,522 Points:1,741,020 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 12:51:11 PM
Ticobird from huntsville posted..
"It's good to read news about a lobbying group who is pro Keystone XL."
.
Lobbying group?
Its the REFINERS ASSOCIATION [shakes head]
What is it that you'd expect the one group who will benefit most from this pipeline to do?
Something ethical?
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:12,522 Points:1,741,020 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 12:46:40 PM
balljars from michigan posted...
"Somebody asked how this pipeline will create permanent jobs thats simple. You have to have people to direct the oil to the port where the ships can then load it. Or if it is going to be made into some product such as gas or diesel it has to go to a refinery to have that done and this takes a lot of people also. So whatever is to be done with the oil it will take a lot of workers with permanent jobs."
.
You do realize, that all the port and refinery facilities already exist, and are already operational...
... right?
The Port Arthur and Houston port facilities are existing facilities that have been in place for years, as are the refineries that have used these same ports to off-load and on-load crude oil and various crude oil products for decades. The refineries are already refining crude oil at these facilities, so no NEW jobs will be created. The refineries are already exporting via these ports, so no NEW jobs will be created.
These are automated processes, there is no massive work-force required to operate the computers that run the automated processes. Your jobs, are even bigger pipe dreams than the ones TransCanada claim will be created.
Amazing.
|
Ticobird

Champion Author
Huntsville
Posts:1,627 Points:781,450 Joined:Oct 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 12:43:55 PM
It's good to read news about a lobbying group who is pro Keystone XL.
|
DieselCash

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:1,290 Points:153,755 Joined:Sep 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 12:24:32 PM
lets build it, keep pushing
|
HailstormCA

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:6,352 Points:1,172,575 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 11:35:55 AM
Don't wait. Get'er done today.
|
Cheepo

Champion Author
Tampa
Posts:8,123 Points:2,778,790 Joined:Apr 2003
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 11:32:03 AM
Again, wait for the next election!!!!!!!
|
Galmar352

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:10,026 Points:1,847,960 Joined:Dec 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 11:30:52 AM
So the House (full of Republicans) passed something that doesn't mean a hill of beans until the Senate (full of Democrats) agrees to it.
USELESS!!!
|
Anddy_viper888

Sophomore Author
New York
Posts:195 Points:10,545 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 11:00:53 AM
okey
|
fukami

Champion Author
Pennsylvania
Posts:1,508 Points:351,800 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:55:58 AM
Same Shyt, Different Day
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:12,522 Points:1,741,020 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:28:52 AM
Well, I'm tired of all the people whining, when no one forced them to read this or any other news article.
Please find somewhere else to comment. You have FIFTY articles to choose from.
[Edited by: Martinman at 2/8/2012 11:30:47 AM EST]
|
Soglaos

Champion Author
Virginia Beach
Posts:1,263 Points:397,845 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:23:39 AM
I am tired of all the articles on this pipeline please find something else to write about
|
Kato51

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:5,793 Points:1,868,970 Joined:Jul 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:20:33 AM
Great. Lets get on with it.
|
esquared

Champion Author
Oklahoma City
Posts:6,533 Points:1,664,045 Joined:Jan 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:18:25 AM
"...American refineries would use nearly all of the oil transported by the Keystone XL pipeline to manufacture fuels and other products for American consumers and businesses...."
How could he possibly know this when a significant portion of refined hydrocarbons are already exported? Pure self-serving speculation.
|
SkyWarnTX

All-Star Author
Texas
Posts:945 Points:56,845 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:14:36 AM
Three -OUT DATED- eastern Pennsylvania refineries are closing due to the fact that the U.S. is EXPORTING GASOLINE, there is TOO MUCH GASOLINE in AMERICA...
Instead of building a Keystone Pipeline to TEXAS, all CANADA has to do is PURCHASE these THREE(3) eastern Pennsylvania refineries ... PROBLEM SOLVED... REPUBLICANS would lose their VOICE if a law were passed to prohibit EXPORT of KEYSTONE PIPELINE Products...
-- Moment of Clarity -- ...
No one wants a OIL PIPELINE built on CLEAN WATER AQUAFIERS... NEVER trust a OIL COMPANY EXECUTIVE to take care of your CLEAN WATER... FRACKING, PIPELINE or otherwise... there are no OIL COMPANY EXECUTIVEs living in your WATER DISTRICT... FLAMMABLE WATER is something a BRITA or PUR water filter can NOT fix...
-- Moment of Clarity --
...Price of OIL is DOWN, U.S. is Exporting Refined Gasoline to OTHER CONTRIES...
-- Moment of Clarity -- ...
Republican Oil Company Owners are Manipulating Gas Prices... in their bid to retake the White House in November...
-- Moment of Clarity -- ...
|
buzzieNY

Champion Author
Buffalo
Posts:1,101 Points:280,765 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:11:42 AM
Obama says no. The republicans have been working on different ways to get it passed. And then some people keep blaming the republicans. If you remember a back a couple of month ago, some guy advised the Secretary of State (Mrs. Clinton)that more studies were needed before it could be approved. The State Department is involved because of the Borders. WAYYYYY to much government.
At least they are trying to pass something that will help with jobs. Obama keeps talking about all the Jobs he has created. But were are all these jobs, I don't know of anyone that got one. And I haven't heard of any stories about all these new jobs.. Build the Pipeline..
|
Bud122CA

Champion Author
California
Posts:5,746 Points:1,253,225 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:10:50 AM
We need the jobs, boost our economy and find a way to put a lid / limit on oil company profits
|
jorobins538

Champion Author
Chicago
Posts:3,994 Points:463,140 Joined:Sep 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:10:29 AM
greedy greedy piggies
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:12,522 Points:1,741,020 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:10:29 AM
AC-302 from los angeles posted...
"Note that the article says: "Although American refineries would use nearly all of the oil transported by the Keystone XL pipeline.."
--OK, so then we in America WOULD be consuming most of that Canadian crude. It isn't all simply going out the back door. To me that silences most of the critics that are claiming Keystone will not benefit America.
.Wow.
Have you people really become so blinded by your politics, that you can't even see that you're being played for comlete idiots?
Go back and read what Drevna actually says, the WHOLE statement:
"... Although American refineries would use nearly all of the oil transported by the Keystone XL pipeline to manufacture fuels and other products for American consumers and businesses, it would also allow them to continue to export a portion of their products...."
... it would also allow them to continue to export a portion of their products. Just how recently was it stated that the Keystone XL pipeline was not going to be used to move crude oil to the Gulf coast, where it would be exported?
Like up to the time of the press releases?
And it does not matter whether they're exporting crude oil, or refined crude oil products, it will STILL have the affect of increasing our dependence on foreign crude oil. And at the same time the Gulf coast refiners have been exporting 1 MILLION BARRELS PER DAY of distillate fuel and nearly 3 MILLION BARRELS PER DAY of crude oil and refined products.
Distillate fuel is diesel fuel and home heating oil. The same diesel fuel that continues to run at a 30- to 50-cent-per-gallon premium above gasoline. And for those of you paying for home heating oil this winter, has your cost dropped this year compared to previous winters - since we now have all this excess distillate fuel that we can export a MILLION BARRELS PER DAY?
Just as the "Cushing Link" is little more than an industry contrivied plan (better known as collusion) to push the price of Canadian heavy crude higher, the exportation of refined products is having the same affect on prices that Americans pay for all petroleum products, which in turn drives other prices higher that rely on those same refined products.
Continuing with Drevna's statement:
"... For the first time in more than 60 years, the United States is a net exporter and the Keystone XL pipeline will help our nation maintain this position, as well as create jobs for American workers, lower the trade deficit and increase American tax revenues."
Again, it will NOT create American jobs. Roughly 90% of the pipeline construction will be accomplished by TransCanada employees and contractor crews that are already employed. The refineries are largely automated, so increasing the amount of crude oil refined will not increase the number of jobs.
Furthermore, it will NOT increase tax revenue. The FOREIGN-OWNED refineries in the Port Arthur Free Trade Zone are exempt from taxes, tarriffs, and export duties, as per the Foreign Trade Zone Act of 1934. And as the increase in the pump-price continues to decrease demand for fuel, so will the gasoline and diesel fuel tax revenue decline. Any another claim is an outright lie.
But it gets better:
"... Today's vote marks an important step forward to enable American refineries and American workers to do more to serve consumers by manufacturing vital fuels and other products that make modern life possible," Drevna said. "By bringing 700,000 barrels of oil each day to U.S. refineries on the Gulf Coast from oil fields in Canada, North Dakota and Montana, the Keystone XL pipeline will enhance America's national, economic and energy security...."
Not only does TransCanada intend to transport Canadian heavy crude oil to the Gulf coast for refining and export, IT PLANS TO DO THE SAME WITH THE AMERICAN CRUDE OIL NOW BEING PRODUCED IN NORTH DAKOTA AND MONTANA.
This is why TransCanada is pushing so hard for the completion of Phase IV of the Keystone XL plan.
That's right, these greedy bastards intend to do the same thing with OUR American crude oil, laughing all the way to the bank while they do it TAX FREE.
This WILL cost American jobs. Currently, crude oil from the Bakken formation is being transported to market via rail, just like coal for power generation is transported out of this region. Transferring the movement of the Bakken crude oil from American-owned rail, to Canadian-owned pipeline, will take away jobs, tax revenue, and corporate profits.
Remember the "Big sucking sound"? That's the Keystone XL, sucking the life out of the American economy...
."Brawndo! It's got electrolytes. It's got what plants need...!"
|
balljars

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:6,628 Points:1,314,300 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:07:07 AM
Somebody asked how this pipeline will create permanent jobs thats simple. You have to have people to direct the oil to the port where the ships can then load it. Or if it is going to be made into some product such as gas or diesel it has to go to a refinery to have that done and this takes a lot of people also. So whatever is to be done with the oil it will take a lot of workers with permanent jobs.
[Edited by: balljars at 2/8/2012 11:08:03 AM EST]
|
k2kipp

Champion Author
Minnesota
Posts:1,635 Points:842,190 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:05:49 AM
Another yawn...
|
boatcrazyinme

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:1,693 Points:398,845 Joined:Apr 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 10:04:54 AM
lets do it.
|
chyguy3

Champion Author
Wyoming
Posts:2,047 Points:683,335 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:59:19 AM
Help is on the way, says Mighty Mouth, ah Mouse.
|
Boo1989

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:5,431 Points:1,087,455 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:58:35 AM
oweBOWmao killed the pipeline to make his big donor warren "I don't pay enough taxes" buffett even richer with his railroad transporting that oil that the pipe line would carry.
|
tsgasprc

All-Star Author
Colorado
Posts:836 Points:264,275 Joined:Jun 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:58:19 AM
With America's upcoming tightening policy in 2014-2015, we will be the only ones who can afford to buy oil, then the prices will fall, eventually leading to a more supply/demand market.
|
IBHENRY

All-Star Author
San Diego
Posts:940 Points:250,985 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:57:24 AM
good
|
snappytom2

Champion Author
Corpus Christi
Posts:2,165 Points:201,260 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:55:31 AM
What is the portion to be exported, 10%, 40%, or 90%? And, how will using Keystone pipeline oil in lieu of other oil supplies create permanent jobs?
|
Lengas

Champion Author
Gary
Posts:11,640 Points:2,358,425 Joined:Nov 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:55:16 AM
Dump obummer and stop exporting oil and gas.
|
smokinjoe54

Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:2,925 Points:594,450 Joined:Feb 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:54:45 AM
Get it built.
|
bluebird1

Champion Author
Toronto
Posts:13,981 Points:2,760,740 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:54:09 AM
What other response would you expect from a Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers President!!! Let's hear why republicans think this is part of Highways & Democrats reasoning that delaying longer will save them.
|
Hugo40

Champion Author
Kentucky
Posts:5,811 Points:1,258,875 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:52:35 AM
Nuff said, either build it or not.
|
Michaels2011

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:1,886 Points:93,725 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:51:40 AM
Build it and quit stalling.
|
dinomen

All-Star Author
Arkansas
Posts:771 Points:486,395 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:51:14 AM
Good.
|
doncNJ

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:5,704 Points:1,145,120 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:50:07 AM
At least they are trying to pass something that will help with jobs.
|
bbthegun

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:4,883 Points:1,359,615 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:49:28 AM
Count my applause.
|
sydb7

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:1,897 Points:1,576,255 Joined:Mar 2003
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:49:27 AM
Pipeline oil = For Export Only! Consumers won't see a drop! And pump prices will still be high! Just what the oil companies want!
|
bridgerunner

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:2,985 Points:650,860 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:48:50 AM
I applaud them also.
|
ifallsguy

Champion Author
Minnesota
Posts:4,709 Points:1,309,465 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:48:23 AM
is it enthusiastic or polite applause?
|
pnivens

Veteran Author
Georgia
Posts:411 Points:174,790 Joined:Oct 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2012 9:47:54 AM
At least the House is doing it's job although the Senate will squash it but then the upcoming election will hopefully show them the door out!
|